When C4 get it right: Born to be Different

I am a bit of a sucker for documentaries about growing up or growing older. When I left my last job, my colleagues bought me the box set of the Up series, and it remains one of my favourite things I’ve ever seen. I love Child of Our TimeBut I’m particularly drawn to Born to be Different because this is growing up/growing older + disability.

I’ve taken Channel 4 to task before for what I consider to be ableist, unfair disability programming in the form of The UndateablesI stand by what I said in that post. But equally, Born to be Different is proof that when they get it right, they really, really get it right.

Disability is a strange thing. In some ways, with many disabilities, it seems the biggest physical challenges come early on. Will a child walk? How bad is the brain damage? What’s the diagnosis? Once those things are established, it can only get easier, right?

I’m increasingly not sure that’s true.

The Born to be Different kids are turning 16, and I’ve realised, for the first time, that disability splits in two. For some people, it’s a battle to live with a condition – to maintain self esteem, independence, faith – in the face of a world that increasingly judges them. For others, with life-shortening conditions, it’s a battle just to survive.

The life-shortening conditions are heartbreaking, obviously, but they’re harder to relate to. The kids with these conditions are still just that – kids, and it’s their parents and siblings you really feel for, because they can express just how hard life is in the face of such epic disability.

And then it gets complicated. Because although Zoe, who has arthrogryposis, is much more disabled than I am, I relate to the challenges of her condition, which affects the mobility of her arms and legs. I’m in tears as she talks about giving up netball, and then PE more generally, because ‘people can be nasty.’ Now, she says, ‘she wants to be a barrister,’ and I recognise too that turn to academia as an area in which is is possible to succeed. And god, I want Zoe to succeed.

In the episode I watched tonight, she was encouraged to apply for head girl, and I was immediately transported back to my last year of middle school, when I won the prize for overall contribution to the school. I was twelve, and it felt like the last time I was in any way at ease with myself (in many ways, I already wasn’t). Zoe panicked about making a speech, and as she struggled up to the podium, I completely got why – it’s not easy being the centre of attention when your body won’t cooperate. I cried, a lot, both for her, and for me, because I feel a million miles away from a happy-go-lucky childhood, and I’m not sure I could readopt that approach to the world even if I wanted to – snark and sarcasm are an easier and more robust defence. But Zoe is lovely, and I hope that, against the odds, she finds a way to maintain that as she grows older.

The boys in the programme so far have all been much sicker, so it’s hard to say whether there’s a gender split in how hard disability hits as you reach adulthood, but the Radio Times’ summary of next week’s episode, and its focus on dating, depressed me:

‘At 15 years old, Emily is interested in boys, although she’ll need one who won’t balk at her manually sluicing out her bowel several times a day. Similarly, Zoe worries that boys who claim to see past her arthrogryposis don’t mean it.’

There is something about the way that’s written that pisses me off. Will both Emily and Zoe find dating harder because of disability? Almost certainly. But ‘manually sluicing out her bowel several times a day’ is oddly graphic and unnecessarily explicit. Presumably Emily can do this independently, and any potential boyfriend would have no need to witness it in quite the icky terms its described in here? We need to understand disability better, undoubtedly, but it shouldn’t give us free rein to pore over the details which, it strikes me, are only there to make an able-bodied audience recoil in horror at the realities of life with a disability. It’s a precursor, I reckon, to questions like this.

Channel 4, to their credit, have avoided that this time. It would be nice if the Radio Times could do the same.


4 thoughts on “When C4 get it right: Born to be Different

  1. This really hit me:

    “We need to understand disability better, undoubtedly, but it shouldn’t give us free rein to pore over the details which, it strikes me, are only there to make an able-bodied audience recoil in horror at the realities of life with a disability.”

    Is it that program makers want the able-bodied audience to recoil because that’s the way they get people to watch their programs? We have a lot of programs on here too, which I don’t get why they had been made. The Undateables were on here too, and I couldn’t look at it. Any other program where they highlight disability makes me feel uncomfortable because I feel like they are using people with disabilities for their own benefit. I prefer to watch documentaries that teach me more about things I know little about.

    Great post, luv!

    Rebel xox

  2. There is a lot of stigma about differently abled people having sex. I remember it being a huge plot point of a tv show in the 90’s that the son who had Downs wanted to be with another person. A friend who is blind has also dealt with a lot of shit.

    We talk about sexuality, but even now we are still largely talking about cis and able bodies. Which is a disservice to all.

  3. People are people be they less abled or not.

    I worked for a few years with Riding For The Disabled’s local group. Watching adults as well as children progressing with the help of a horse and volunteers to enable them to accomplish things that they maybe had not considered. Not just the act of riding a horse but by riding a horse gaining confidence and strength in body and mind to think outside of their conditions and flourish in other areas was wonderful to see.

    It can take something very simple to bring a semblence of “normality” to what, for some, can be challenging.

    There is an advertisment here in the UK that catches me every time I see it right at the very end. The girl at the end could be anyone on a horse! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6eZ3WQCjhA

    Velvet x

  4. I have not watched this program but from what you have said it does appear that C4 did a good job, as you say, they often get it wrong but when they get it right they get it very right. However I agree with Rebel, that so often these programs are made to provide entertainment not enlightenment to the masses.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s